No email required. 100% free. Done in 30 seconds.
Transform your code from Kotlin to Java with our free AI-based code convertion tool. If you like what you see, we also create documentation for your code! We don't ever store your code or any representation of it in our databases, but it will be shared with the LLM of our choice for processing.
Converting code from Kotlin to Java might seem daunting at first, but with the right guidelines, you can make the process seamless. This guide provides detailed instructions on how to convert your Kotlin code to Java. By following these steps, you'll be able to effectively translate your Kotlin codebase into Java.
In Kotlin, variable declarations are more concise compared to Java. Here's a basic comparison:
Kotlin:
val immutableVariable: Int = 1
var mutableVariable: Int = 2
Java:
final int immutableVariable = 1;
int mutableVariable = 2;
In Kotlin, val
and var
are used for immutable and mutable variables, respectively. In Java, final
is used to declare a constant, and types are explicitly stated.
Kotlin's null safety is one of its standout features. Converting this to Java requires careful attention:
Kotlin:
var nullableString: String? = null
Java:
String nullableString = null;
In Kotlin, the nullable type is explicitly declared using ?
, whereas in Java, null types are managed manually, necessitating careful null checks.
Kotlin's succinct function syntax needs to be converted to Java's more verbose style:
Kotlin:
fun sum(a: Int, b: Int): Int {
return a + b
}
Java:
int sum(int a, int b) {
return a + b;
}
In Java, return types and parameters must always be explicitly stated at the start.
Kotlin lets you declare properties directly in the primary constructor, which is not possible in Java. Here’s how to deal with this:
Kotlin:
class Person(var name: String, var age: Int)
Java:
public class Person {
private String name;
private int age;
public Person(String name, int age) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public int getAge() {
return age;
}
public void setAge(int age) {
this.age = age;
}
}
Java requires a more boilerplate code to handle properties, including getter and setter methods.
Kotlin extensions are a powerful feature that Java does not natively support. You need to convert these into static utility methods.
Kotlin:
fun String.removeFirstAndLastChar(): String = this.substring(1, this.length - 1)
Java:
public class StringUtils {
public static String removeFirstAndLastChar(String str) {
return str.substring(1, str.length() - 1);
}
}
Static helper classes in Java can replicate Kotlin's extension functions.
Kotlin's coroutines simplify asynchronous programming compared to Java's thread management.
Kotlin:
GlobalScope.launch {
delay(1000L)
println("Hello, World!")
}
Java:
new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println("Hello, World!");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}).start();
In Java, you need to handle threads and exceptions manually, making the code more verbose.
Kotlin supports higher-order functions and lambdas natively. Java requires more setup to achieve similar functionality.
Kotlin:
fun doOperation(x: Int, y: Int, operation: (Int, Int) -> Int): Int {
return operation(x, y)
}
val sum = doOperation(1, 2) { a, b -> a + b }
Java:
interface Operation {
int apply(int a, int b);
}
public class Main {
public static int doOperation(int x, int y, Operation operation) {
return operation.apply(x, y);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int sum = doOperation(1, 2, new Operation() {
@Override
public int apply(int a, int b) {
return a + b;
}
});
}
}
Java requires defining interfaces and anonymous inner classes to achieve similar results.
While converting Kotlin to Java is not always straightforward, understanding these key differences will make the process easier. The verbosity of Java compared to Kotlin can be seen in various aspects such as variable declarations, null safety, function syntax, property handling, and more. By paying close attention to these differences, you can ensure a smooth transition of your code.
Document your code using AI
Join thousands of companies documenting their code using AI.
This free AI tool does its best to generate professional documentation. However, it's missing some context from other related files. The paid version takes into account different files to generate documentation for each use case, apart from the documentation of every file. You have also the possibility of add custom concepts to improve the knowledge of your codebase.
No. You don't have to enter any personal information to use Codex's free code documentation tool — it's 100% free.
No. An encrypted version of your code is stored only while its being processed and it's deleted immediately.
If you can work with a custom Azure model in your own account, let us know. If not, Codex also works with open source models that can run on-premises, on your own servers, so your data is always yours. Feel free to get in touch with us!