No email required. 100% free. Done in 30 seconds.
Transform your code from Swift to Javascript with our free AI-based code convertion tool. If you like what you see, we also create documentation for your code! We don't ever store your code or any representation of it in our databases, but it will be shared with the LLM of our choice for processing.
Converting from Swift to Javascript can be a challenging task given the differences in paradigms, syntax, and language features. This guide aims to make this transition smoother for proficient Swift developers who are venturing into Javascript.
Swift is a statically-typed language while Javascript is dynamically-typed. In Swift, types are determined at compile-time, reducing runtime errors. Javascript, on the other hand, determines types at runtime, which provides flexibility but requires more caution.
Swift’s syntax is influenced by Objective-C, whereas Javascript draws inspiration from languages like Java and C. Notable differences in syntax include declaration of variables, function definitions, and error handling techniques.
In Swift:
let constantValue = 10
var variableValue = 20
In Javascript:
const constantValue = 10;
let variableValue = 20;
Here, let
is used for constants in both languages, while var
in Swift corresponds to let
in Javascript for variables. Note that var
can still be used in Javascript but let
is preferred for block-scoped variables.
In Swift:
func greet(name: String) -> String {
return "Hello, \(name)!"
}
In Javascript:
function greet(name) {
return `Hello, ${name}!`;
}
Functions in both languages share similarities, but Swift’s type annotations are not present in Javascript. Note the template literals in Javascript using backticks (`) for string interpolation.
In Swift:
class Person {
var name: String
init(name: String) {
self.name = name
}
func greet() -> String {
return "Hello, \(name)!"
}
}
In Javascript:
class Person {
constructor(name) {
this.name = name;
}
greet() {
return `Hello, ${this.name}!`;
}
}
Though similar in structure, Javascript uses the constructor
method while Swift uses the init
initializer. Additionally, Javascript class methods must be prefixed with this
to refer to instance properties.
In Swift:
func fetchData(completion: @escaping (String) -> Void) {
// Simulating an async task
DispatchQueue.global().async {
let data = "sample data"
completion(data)
}
}
Javascript does not directly support completion handlers but uses Promises or async/await.
In Javascript:
function fetchData() {
return new Promise((resolve) => {
setTimeout(() => {
const data = "sample data";
resolve(data);
}, 1000);
});
}
In Javascript:
async function fetchData() {
return new Promise((resolve) => {
setTimeout(() => {
const data = "sample data";
resolve(data);
}, 1000);
});
}
async function getData() {
const data = await fetchData();
console.log(data);
}
Javascript’s async/await
syntax provides a more readable approach to handling asynchronous operations compared to promises or callback functions.
In Swift:
enum DataError: Error {
case notFound
}
func fetchData() throws -> String {
throw DataError.notFound
}
In Javascript:
class DataError extends Error {
constructor(message) {
super(message);
this.name = "DataError";
}
}
function fetchData() {
throw new DataError("Data not found");
}
try {
fetchData();
} catch (error) {
console.error(error.name + ': ' + error.message);
}
Both languages offer robust error handling, but the paradigms differ. Swift uses throws
and do-catch
, while Javascript uses throw
and try-catch
.
While manually converting Swift code to Javascript can be educational, it is also time-consuming. Utilizing a free Swift to Javascript code converter can accelerate the process. These tools are designed to handle the syntax and semantic transformations required, reducing the manual effort and potential for human error.
By understanding the fundamental differences and learning how to map Swift’s constructs to their Javascript counterparts, you empower yourself to better utilize automated conversion tools or write cross-compatible code manually. Happy coding!
Document your code using AI
Join thousands of companies documenting their code using AI.
This free AI tool does its best to generate professional documentation. However, it's missing some context from other related files. The paid version takes into account different files to generate documentation for each use case, apart from the documentation of every file. You have also the possibility of add custom concepts to improve the knowledge of your codebase.
No. You don't have to enter any personal information to use Codex's free code documentation tool — it's 100% free.
No. An encrypted version of your code is stored only while its being processed and it's deleted immediately.
If you can work with a custom Azure model in your own account, let us know. If not, Codex also works with open source models that can run on-premises, on your own servers, so your data is always yours. Feel free to get in touch with us!