No email required. 100% free. Done in 30 seconds.
Transform your code from Kotlin to Swift with our free AI-based code convertion tool. If you like what you see, we also create documentation for your code! We don't ever store your code or any representation of it in our databases, but it will be shared with the LLM of our choice for processing.
Transitioning from Kotlin to Swift involves understanding key differences in language syntax, structure, and paradigms. Both Kotlin and Swift are modern, statically typed languages, but they have unique features and idioms that can make direct conversion non-trivial.
Both Kotlin and Swift have similar type systems but with distinct syntax.
Kotlin:
val answer: Int = 42
var question: String = "What is the answer?"
Swift:
let answer: Int = 42
var question: String = "What is the answer?"
Use val
in Kotlin and let
in Swift for immutable variables, while var
remains the same for mutable variables.
Functions in Kotlin and Swift have different syntactic structures.
Kotlin:
fun greet(name: String): String {
return "Hello, $name!"
}
Swift:
func greet(name: String) -> String {
return "Hello, \(name)!"
}
In Swift, the return type follows the parameter list, introduced by the ->
symbol. String interpolation in Swift uses \(variable)
inside the string.
Kotlin:
if (x > 5) {
println("Greater than 5")
} else {
println("5 or less")
}
for (item in list) {
println(item)
}
Swift:
if x > 5 {
print("Greater than 5")
} else {
print("5 or less")
}
for item in list {
print(item)
}
Swift eliminates parentheses around conditions, but the basic structure remains similar.
Declaring collections and iterating over them is fairly similar, with a few syntax differences.
Kotlin:
val list: List<Int> = listOf(1, 2, 3)
Swift:
let list: [Int] = [1, 2, 3]
Classes in Kotlin and Swift are somewhat similar but with a few critical differences in their definitions.
Kotlin:
class Person(val name: String, var age: Int) {
fun greet() {
println("Hello, my name is $name.")
}
}
Swift:
class Person {
let name: String
var age: Int
init(name: String, age: Int) {
self.name = name
self.age = age
}
func greet() {
print("Hello, my name is \(name).")
}
}
Swift uses an initializer method init
to set up class properties, whereas Kotlin allows primary constructor parameters directly in the class header.
Kotlin:
open class Animal {
open fun makeSound() {
println("Animal sound")
}
}
class Dog : Animal() {
override fun makeSound() {
println("Bark")
}
}
Swift:
class Animal {
func makeSound() {
print("Animal sound")
}
}
class Dog: Animal {
override func makeSound() {
print("Bark")
}
}
In Swift, all methods are non-overridable by default. You must use the override
keyword to override a method.
Kotlin:
try {
val result = riskyOperation()
} catch (e: Exception) {
e.printStackTrace()
} finally {
println("Finally block executed")
}
Swift:
do {
let result = try riskyOperation()
} catch let error {
print(error)
} finally {
print("Finally block executed")
}
Swift uses the do-try-catch
pattern, which is comparable to Kotlin's try-catch
.
Swift introduces optionals as a core part of the type system.
Kotlin:
var name: String? = null
Swift:
var name: String? = nil
Swift optionals (String?
) work similarly to Kotlin's nullable types (String?
), helping to avoid null pointer exceptions.
Converting from Kotlin to Swift is a manageable task for any programmer fluent in Kotlin. Understanding the differences in syntax, idiomatic expressions, and paradigms between Kotlin and Swift is crucial. This guide should help streamline the process and make your code conversion smoother. With practice, converting between these two modern languages will become second nature.
Document your code using AI
Join thousands of companies documenting their code using AI.
This free AI tool does its best to generate professional documentation. However, it's missing some context from other related files. The paid version takes into account different files to generate documentation for each use case, apart from the documentation of every file. You have also the possibility of add custom concepts to improve the knowledge of your codebase.
No. You don't have to enter any personal information to use Codex's free code documentation tool — it's 100% free.
No. An encrypted version of your code is stored only while its being processed and it's deleted immediately.
If you can work with a custom Azure model in your own account, let us know. If not, Codex also works with open source models that can run on-premises, on your own servers, so your data is always yours. Feel free to get in touch with us!